Friday, March 09, 2007

A new article in Appleton Post underlines the EDTA evidence discrepancy in the OJ Simpson case. In the case discussed by Appleton the argument put forward by the prosecution was that no planting of blood evidence was made due to the complete lack of EDTA in their crime scene blood samples while old blood samples from the accused held a large amount of EDTA .
In the OJ Simpson case a fairly large amount of EDTA was found in th 'bedroom sock' even though the lab technician used a low sample rate for his tests and erased the tape record of his test settings.
This would tend to support the suspicion that the blood on 'bedroom sock' was planted.