A new article in Appleton Post underlines the EDTA evidence discrepancy in the OJ Simpson case. In the case discussed by Appleton the argument put forward by the prosecution was that no planting of blood evidence was made due to the complete lack of EDTA in their crime scene blood samples while old blood samples from the accused held a large amount of EDTA .
In the OJ Simpson case a fairly large amount of EDTA was found in th 'bedroom sock' even though the lab technician used a low sample rate for his tests and erased the tape record of his test settings.
This would tend to support the suspicion that the blood on 'bedroom sock' was planted.

It seems that a Montreal publishing company is interested in publishing OJ Simpson's book- with a new title. That would be good news if it relates some new information about the murders - or even reminders of information that has been overlooked or forgotten. I hope it won't just be another round of verbiage between him and Golden.
A number of murder cases recently have resulted in convictions based mostly on demeanor of the accused. One was based on an ex wife's testimony that he wasn't with her the night another woman was murdered and that was a change from her first testimony. No blood or hair from the accused was found at the murder scene although other hair was found.
In this day and age when forensic science has so progressed, more exculpatory weight should be given to lack of forensic evidence.

The smoke and mirrors just got intensified with the latest revelations regarding OJ Simpson's proposed book. The possibility of a witness should prompt people to try and recall the testimonies in the murder trial. We should have known by now the identity of the people heard by Rosa Lopez and Kato about 2:30 AM and especially the people Mark Fuhrman tracked by helicopter in their car at about 6:30 AM, all at Rockingham.